> I do not know who is responsible for the sabotage, but they should be > messages, are displayed, only the top half of each line of text is > gone, and, in gmail, in the message indexes, where the lists of ![]() > installed add-ons have been disappeared, most of the functionality is > All previous saved sessions have been disappeared, most of the > It has a similar effect to deleting a partition table. > involved installing the dangerous v57 of firepox. > What it did not tell me, before I performed the upgrade, was that this > "security upgrade" was needed to be performed, including a needed > I performed a system "security upgrade" on Linux, as it showed that a "So once you do know what the question actually It is clear that Internet Explorer v3 would be safer to use, than firepox v57. Made clear that anyone who is still using firepox, should not performĪny further upgrades, as it is simply too dangerous. It is clear that it is safer to not upgrade firepox, and it has been I do not know who is responsible for the sabotage, but they should be Messages, are displayed, only the top half of each line of text is Gone, and, in gmail, in the message indexes, where the lists of Installed add-ons have been disappeared, most of the functionality is It has a similar effect to deleting a partition table.Īll previous saved sessions have been disappeared, most of the Involved installing the dangerous v57 of firepox. What it did not tell me, before I performed the upgrade, was that this ![]() "security upgrade" was needed to be performed, including a needed Migration away from performed a system "security upgrade" on Linux, as it showed that a.It doesn’t give me pleasure to state it outright but it’s always the resources issue. I do apologize for the long windedness and the decision to only update 2.53.x. So the final conclusion, as mentioned above, is that only 2.53.x + will get updates. As mentioned earlier in a post on the support mailing list, only versions > 2.33 (iirc) can be updated due to certificates not being recognized and that can’t be helped.)) (Still, a part of me is reserving the right to modify the system to allow updates from 2.49.x to 2.49.5 at least. All other versions polling for updates will not get any. The benefit of the SeaMonkey project sticking with only 2.53.x + updates is that these updates will work on systems being updated. I realize this may sound like an excuse for ignoring old software but there really only so much we can do particularly when the engine is changing so rapidly that we’re trying to keep track of the *latest* stuff coming out from Mozilla. It’s just that using it on an actual system could potentially harm the system. Does this mean the old versions can’t be used? No. This is the unfortunate by-product of technological progression. Is it possible to set up a VM to build old software? Possibly but is it worth the time and resources? Unfortunately, the answer here is no. Furthermore, even websites are now finicky as to which browser can view them, which further adds to the frustrations of using old SeaMonkey versions. If big corporations can’t/won’t support old operating systems what hope do we (as a small group of volunteers) have? Is this a justification to leave old software high and dry? No but it is not realistic to expect a small group of volunteers to support software that no longer build on any system. Ditto with the Windows Servers (NT, to 2008). ![]() Win 1 to (recently) Win7 are no longer supported. The 2.49.1 – 2.49.4 to 2.49.5 update is a special case as the 2.49.5 update files had changed and we missed the opportunity to create a set of transitional update files for that.īig corporations, like Microsoft, no longer support old operating systems. As of this writing, I’m not entirely sure the 2.49.* family will ever be updated (but you’ll never know). Any other previous versions are no longer supported in terms of updates. The SeaMonkey Project will only be supporting the 2.53.* (Gecko 56) family. ![]() I had posted this concern on the lists and probably here as well but I’m just going to repeat myself. *That* was my intention.Īs in with intentions mixed in with life, things aren’t that simple. Like, if you had installed 1.x, you’d be able to upgrade to 2.53.7.1. My original intention was to allow any version upgrade to any other greater version (barring operating system restrictions etc.). Tl dr: SeaMonkey 2.53.* (and newer) are the only versions that will have updates. will be left as is (mainly because one of these days, that domain will be decomissioned (since it is Mozilla’s)) I’m hoping to switch the to using the new update system. I’m putting this post up to better clarify the situation with the updates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |